 |
| Source: ratehub |
Source: The Ultimate Scam!
Most Canadians are aware of the existence of the Bank of
Canada (BoC) but beyond that, very few know little more. It is assumed that the
BoC is owned by the federal government, i.e. a public asset. Under Section 3(2)
of The Bank of Canada
Act, the BoC is described as a “body corporate”. Black’s Law dictionary,
6th edition (page 175) defines a body corporate as “a public or
private corporation”. In a recent communication received from the BoC, a
representative stated that the BoC “is not a public corporation.” The BoC
is, therefore, a private corporation! But who owns it?
The Bank is made up of a Governor, Deputy Governor and twelve directors.
The directors are chosen by the Minister of Finance with the approval of the
Governor in Council and the twelve directors are responsible for the appointment
of a Governor and Deputy Governor with the approval of the Governor in Council.
The Deputy Minister of Finance is a member of the board but he has no
vote!! There is no provision in the
BoC Act for the appointment of elected representatives to the board of the Bank.
(I think it is safe to assume from this set-up that the duly elected Parliament
has no say in the policies and operations of the BoC). The capital of the bank
is divided into one hundred thousand shares with a par value of $50.00 each.
(Section 17.1 and 17.2) and the shares are held by the Minister on behalf of Her
Majesty in right of Canada! (Section 17.3 of the BoC Act.) It would seem that the BoC is owned by the Queen, a foreign head
of state and not owned by the Government of Canada. (This fact was also
confirmed by an official of the BoC) It is certainly clear however, that the
Federal Parliament and the people of Canada do not own it or benefit from its
activities.
So what was the purpose behind the creation of the Bank of Canada?
The answer to this can be found in the preamble to the BoC Act. It states
“Whereas it is desirable to establish a central bank in Canada to regulate
credit and currency in the best interests of the economic life of the nation, to
control and protect the external value of the monetary unit and to mitigate by
its influence fluctuations in the general level of production, trade, prices,
and employment, so far as may be possible within the scope of monetary action,
and generally to promote the economic and financial welfare of Canada.” Very
noble, but has the BoC lived up to its principles? You decide.
Under Section 18(h), (i) and (j) of the BoC Act “Business and
Powers of the Bank”, the Bank may make loans or advances to the Federal or
Provincial levels of government. These loans can be for any amount, be secured
or unsecured and the Bank is free to charge whatever rate of interest it chooses
– presumably even a zero rate of interest.
There are a number of restrictions, which apply to these loans, a very
few of which have been made in the past. BoC correspondence indicates the Bank
has made 19 loan advances to the Federal government and one loan to a Province
in the past (3 million dollars to Saskatchewan in 1936). The last loan was made
in 1961. BoC correspondence states “it is not the bank’s role to be a source of
financing for governments nor a source of financing government deficits.” This
would seem to contradict the Bank’s primary purpose as expressed in the preamble
and renders Section 18 (h), (i) and (j) as redundant. So why does the BoC act
this way? To better understand the actions of the BoC, people need to understand
how the existing private debt money system
works.
The Bank of Canada began as a privately
owned institution and at the time of its inception (1934), Alberta was in the
midst of a revolution of sorts. A small group of people came to understand the
origin of recessions and depressions and the corruption of bankers and were
moving with plans to control the vitriolic policies of these same bankers. Big
finance moved to have itself established as a central bank in Canada through the
passage of the BoC Act,
giving it exclusive authority over the money supply of this country. (This was
and still is in contempt of our so-called constitution, Section 91.14 and
91.15.) It didn’t take long for people everywhere, especially Alberta to
recognize this same group of unscrupulous individuals (bankers) as the ones
behind the passage of the BoC Act. The depression was to continue unabated
through the twenties and early thirties, but Alberta was determined to get
control of what it believed was the ultimate social responsibility of a
government – to provide a mechanism of debt free money creation as a means for
the people to live and prosper without having the private banks stealing our
wealth through usury, the wealth of those who create it in the first place,
YOU!. The Alberta Credit House Act – An Act to provide the people of Alberta
with additional credit, was passed and led to the setting up of a number of
Treasury Branches throughout the Province. (This law has never been disavowed by
any government in Ottawa.) Alberta acted
according to the terms of the laws of 1867 (our Constitution), which allowed the
provincial legislatures to “borrow money on the sole credit of the Province”.
That is to say, upon the real wealth of the province, which means that there is
no doubt that there is actually a provincial credit. And the Province can
certainly establish its own mechanism to use this credit directly, without
mortgaging its wealth or going into debt to individuals or corporations like the
private banks.
The BoC responded by changing its shares from class shares to completely
benign shares and depositing them with the Minster of Finance in exchange for a
sum of tax dollars ($5 million). This idea gave the illusion that the bank was
now owned and controlled by the government. So how could a privately owned
corporation, with the power to bring a government and a country to its knees
within hours, be taken over without as much as a whimper? Could it be that the
Bank of Canada preferred to appear that it had been taken over (nationalized)
while it maintained its independence and powers? Unfortunately, with the start
of the Second World War, the Province of Alberta suspended implementation of
their credit plan and it was ultimately abandoned.
Well, those who knew and understood the bankers and how their monetary
policies and system operated weren’t fooled. Hundreds of pages of evidence was
brought before a Standing Committee in 1939 which showed clearly how deeply
indebted the Provinces were to the private banks as a result of the depression
and the monetary policies in effect at that time. (The first Governor, Graham
Towers was also present at these hearings to answer questions as well.)
Provinces had been seeking loans from the BoC but were being denied and forced
to borrow from the private banks and abroad. The reason finally given for the
BoC’s unwillingness to lend to the provinces was that the provinces were not
willing to enter into an arrangement with the BoC similar to that of the arrangement the BoC
had with the federal government. This arrangement gave the BoC the lofty position of being the government’s
fiscal agent. Only the BoC sells government securities - bonds and T-bills. The
BoC also "sells" notes at face value to financial institutions for circulation
throughout the country. If the Bank of Canada wants a tight monetary policy, the
Bank of Canada can limit the amount of
money the government can borrow by decreasing the number of securities it
sells. The BoC uses other measures to tighten the money supply as well, such as
increasing the interest rates and making it more difficult for borrowers to
borrow money. Through these actions, a recession is born. The effect is the
government receives less in taxes at every level and, of course, the demand for
government assistance rises. To compound the problem, the government has no
ability to refuse the high interest rates the BoC imposes on it and the
taxpayers. The government has no ability to circumvent the decisions of the BoC.
All revenue to the government flows through the Receiver General, who happens to
be a servant of the BoC and not the government.
The Bank of Canada appears to have other controls over government. While
reading the evidence of the Standing Committee on Banking and Finance held in
1939 and Hansard, members of the committee raised the issue of the bank’s
control over spending decisions of the government. There was reference to
questions by low-profile backbenchers of the House of Commons about why this was
so. Or, why any other policy was not being carried out even though it would
greatly assist the economy. The response in the House of Commons would indicate
that, although the government wished to proceed, the money was not available
because of decisions made outside of government! This was confirmed many
years later when the governor of the BoC told the government on more than one
occasion that Canada was in no position to kick-start the economy. (As if the
government could have done it without the blessing of the BoC.)
During the Standing Committee on Banking and Finance in 1939, Graham
Towers admitted the only thing that would limit Canada’s involvement in the war
was manpower. Money would not be a problem! Yet the Bank of Canada
refused to put out money for any job creation, infrastructure expansion, or aid
for the poor, the old, the sick, the unemployed, the farmers, small business or
any other policy suggestions that had been put forth by the federal or
provincial governments.
The reality is that the federal government can’t by pen and paper without the permission of the Bank of Canada, and all money the public
considers “waste” is willingly and culpably paid out by the Bank of Canada. When
Canada is in a recession (created by the BoC), the Bank of Canada will do
nothing to help the country out of it until it considers the timing to be right
and the solutions offered are usually a further detriment to the economy over
the long run for most of us except those on the “inner circle” who really know
what is going on and can profit from it.
Canadian banks and Credit Unions are now controlled by both the Bank of
Canada and the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) as well. Located in Switzerland, the BIS holds deposits (i.e. they control) of about 120 central banks and
other international financial institutions throughout the world, including the
Bank of Canada. In other words, the BIS financially controls the globe. It has
direct influence over the direction of
the economy of every country and, indeed, the world through its banking and
monetary policies.
The weapon that all banks have is
the power to withhold loans, thus driving an economy into the ground in a hurry.
Personal and corporate bankruptcies, lost jobs, disintegrating social programs
and other unpleasant consequences are a direct result of these policies. There
is no government that can afford to offend its central bank. The Bank of Canada
will do what it wants to do, and what the BIS wants it to do. No amount of
pressure from anyone will influence it in any way.
A quote from a 1924 edition of the
American Banker's Association not intended for the public sums up what is
currently happening all around us:
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by
combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as
rapidly as possible. When, through the process of law, the common people lose
their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the
strong arm of government applied by a central power of wealth under leading
financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men who are now
engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world. By dividing the
voter through the political party system, we can get them to expend their
energies in fighting for questions of no importance. It is
thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well
planned and so successfully accomplished."
The bottom line is that our present situation will not improve, ever,
until we have significant reform to our banking and monetary policies. What has happened in this country is a result
of lack of knowledge as to how we are being shafted by the present system and it
must be changed. We must all make the effort to educate ourselves and our
family, friends and neighbours as to the truth behind the financial demise we
face today. Again, this is the purpose of this website, to inform and educate.
Please take time to read through and understand how we are being robbed under
the present system and how we can change it for the benefit of all
Canadians.
Disclaimer:
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports,
documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way,
shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement
or support of any of such posted material or parts therein. The information
herein contained is for educational and/or entertainment purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or
completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on
this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this
information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be
liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this
information. These terms and conditions of use are subject to change at any time
and without notice.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario