BACK TO TOP

Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta mad scientists. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta mad scientists. Mostrar todas las entradas

martes, 7 de octubre de 2014

STALIN´S HUMANZEES: CHIMPANZEE-HUMAN HYBRIDISATION EXPERIMENTS


Source: Elusive.Animals via YouTube

Quote:

"The humanzee (also known as the Chuman or Manpanzee) is a hypothetical chimpanzee/human hybrid. Chimpanzees and humans are closely related (sharing 95% of their DNA sequence and 99% of coding DNA sequences), leading to contested speculation that a hybrid is possible.

The Ivanov experiments

Ilya Ivanovich Ivanov was the first person to attempt to create a human--ape hybrid. As early as 1910 he gave a presentation to the World Congress of Zoologists in Graz, Austria, in which he described the possibility of creating such a hybrid by artificial insemination.

In 1924, while working at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, Ivanov obtained permission from the Institute's directors to use its experimental primate station in Kindia, French Guinea, for such an experiment. Ivanov attempted to gain backing for his project from the Soviet government. He dispatched letters to the People's Commissar on Education and Science Anatoliy Vasilievich Lunacharsky and to other officials. Ivanov's proposal finally sparked the interest of Nikolai Petrovich Gorbunov, the head of the Department of Scientific Institutions. In September 1925 Gorbunov helped allocate US$10,000 to the USSR Academy of Sciences (now the Russian Academy of Sciences) for Ivanov's human-ape hybridization experiments in Africa.

In March 1926 Ivanov arrived at the Kindia facility, but stayed only a month without success. The Kindia site, it turned out, had no sexually mature chimpanzees. He returned to France where he arranged through correspondence with French Guinea's colonial governor to set up experiments at the botanical gardens in Conakry.

Ivanov reached Conakry in November 1926 accompanied by his son, also named Ilya, who would assist him in his experiments. Ivanov supervised the capture of adult chimpanzees in the interior of the colony, which were brought to Conakry and kept in cages in the botanical gardens. On February 28, 1927, Ivanov inseminated two female chimpanzees with his own sperm. On June 25, his son inseminated a third chimpanzee with his sperm. The Ivanovs left Africa in July with thirteen chimps, including the three used in his experiments. They already knew before leaving that the first two chimpanzees had failed to become pregnant. The third died in France, and was also found not to have been pregnant. The remaining chimps were sent to a new primate station at Sukhumi.

Although Ivanov attempted to organize the insemination of human females with chimpanzee sperm in Guinea, these plans met with resistance from the French colonial government and there is no evidence such an experiment was arranged there.

Upon his return to the Soviet Union in 1927, Ivanov began an effort to organize hybridization experiments at Sukhumi using ape sperm and human females. Eventually in 1929, through the help of Gorbunov, he obtained the support of the Society of Materialist Biologists, a group associated with the Communist Academy. In the spring of 1929 the Society set up a commission to plan Ivanov's experiments at Sukhumi. They decided that at least five volunteer women would be needed for the project. However, in June 1929, before any inseminations had taken place, Ivanov learned that the only postpubescent male ape remaining at Sukhumi (an orangutan) had died. A new set of chimps would not arrive at Sukhumi until the summer of 1930.

Rumored humanzees

There have been no scientifically verified specimens of a human/ape hybrid. A performing chimp named Oliver was popularized during the 1970s as a possible chuman/humanzee, but genetic tests conducted at the University of Chicago concluded that, despite Oliver's somewhat unusual appearance and behavior, he was a normal chimpanzee: he had the same number of chromosomes as normal chimpanzees. The "hybrid" claims may merely have been a promotional gimmick. Despite the dismissal of the claim, Oliver's representational legacy persists in popular culture. The decades-long speculation about his possible human-chimp hybrid origins led to numerous references, many satirical or at least intended to be humorous. For example, the Church of the SubGenius, which has a feast day or holy day (and sometimes several) every day of the year, designates October 20 The Feast of Saint Oliver the humanzee.

In addition, some musical outfits reference Oliver's legacy, such Ontario's The Humanzees. Depictions like these generally ignore or predate the proof that Oliver is not a hybrid. Oliver has been regularly discussed by Karl Pilkington on The Ricky Gervais Show, in a feature called "Monkey News".







"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
 

lunes, 3 de septiembre de 2012

THE NEXT GM BATTLEFIELD: THE FRANKENSTEIN FARMS



Source: MailOnline

By Sean Poulter


GENETIC modification could lead to 'zombie' farm animals programmed to feel no pain or stress, Government advisers warned yesterday.

The disturbing image of ranks of 'animal vegetables' was painted by members of the new Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission as part of an attempt to raise public awareness of the next GM battlefield - the Frankenstein Farmyards.

Despite the backlash over GM crops, most people are still ignorant of the rapid developments and ethical implications of genetic engineering of animals, they said. Regulatory action is needed soon because current experiments will soon be turned into commercial reality. Laboratories are already working to produce chickens which have more breast meat and sheep which grow more wool. Cows are being altered to ensure their milk is less fatty while pigs are being engineered to grow at incredibly fast rates. One firm in the U.S. has said it will be ready to start supplying genetically-engineered salmon to fish farms around the world within a year. 'Super-animals' carrying human genes are being created which can be farmed in sterile conditions to provide transplant organs such as hearts and lungs.

Yesterday the commission, which was set up to provide advice which will form the core of legislation to cope with the leaps in technology, launched a massive consultation exercise to involve the public in the future on GM policy in Britain.

At the same time papers issued by two commission members, scientist Dr Matthew Freeman and academic Dr Ben Mepham, highlighted the need to take into account major concerns for animal welfare as well as ethical and religious objections.

Dr Mepham, of Nottingham University, executive director of the Food Ethics Council, argued that the impact of GM on animals in both food and medical fields is huge. He said it might become 'technically possible to produce 'animal vegetables' --highly prolific and oblivious to their physical and mental status'.

While that might reduce the pain and stress of factory farming, this did not mean it should be allowed to develop without question, he argued. He warned that many of the GM experiments on animals have resulted in cruelty, producing mutants or animals which grow so large in the womb that they can only be surgically removed.

His paper stated: 'The question of whether humanity should take it upon ourselves to alter animals by GM is undoubtedly critical for many people.'

Fundamental religious groups would see it as 'an attempt to usurp God's role' while others would be unhappy about 'so fundamentally altering the natural order'.

Dr Freeman warned: 'Animal GM has not yet hit the public consciousness in the way that plant GM has, but its development is well advanced.'

The scientist, an expert in molecular biology with the Medical Research Council, said GM animals are being engineered to grow bigger and more quickly to increase food production. The addition of genes for various growth factors and hormones can improve food yield from agriculturally important animals.

'Examples recently discussed have been rapidly growing salmon and chickens with extra breast meat. Many other examples are also being experimented with.' His paper stressed: 'As a controversial issue, this has all the right elements. There are very substantial potential benefits but it raises all the same concerns as plant genetic modification with the important added factors of animal welfare.

'GM in principle allows myriad alterations to an organism's biology making it a powerful tool that has the potential both for benefit and harm.' Dr Freeman suggested that large swathes of the population are likely to fight the creation of GM animals, regardless of whether they are for food or medicine.

'Some people will object in principle, on religious, aesthetic or ethical grounds to altering the genetic make-up of animals. There are questions over the process of genetic modification. Even if the end product is acceptable or desirable, is it ethically acceptable to subject animals to the procedures necessary to make them? The ethical issue is also raised of how much animal suffering we as humans are prepared to accept, when balanced against potential benefits to us.'

An increasing number of animals are currently being genetically modified to help in the development of cures for diseases. The papers suggested the benefits could revolutionise medicine and prevent much pain and suffering. They point out how animal organs, such as pig hearts might be genetically modified to ensure they are accepted by the human body without the need for drugs. But they also warned of the dangers of transferring animal viruses to humans and pointed to BSE - and how the Aids virus jumped from apes to humans and BSE.

Yesterday commission chairman, Professor Malcolm Grant said it aimed to 'provide people across the country with a voice in government on GM issues'. He said that as independent advisers they would present both scientific information and reflect the social and ethical views of stakeholders and the general public.'

Last week, Greenpeace campaigners led by Lord Melchett were cleared of criminal damage for wrecking a field of GM maize in a landmark verdict signalling the public's deep suspicion of the 'Brave New World' promised by food scientists.
s.poulter@dailymail.co.uk

Source link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4059/Warning-On-Frankenstein-Farms.html