HUMAN PARROTS: I AM FREE!!!

Source: Soul Pancake Conversations.

PEOPLE ARE BIOLOGICAL ROBOTS: YOU BET!

Source: wilderutopia.com.

By Gundhramns Hammer
December 10, 2014
Select, paste & translate

People are programmed what, how and when to eat; how to dress and what to wear; what, where and when to buy; what to read; what to watch; how, why and where to hoard; how and what to think; what to be afraid of; what language to speak; what games to play; what to listen to; how and what to fuck; where and when to shit; how, when and where to work; how, when and on what to sleep; where to go on vacation; how and what to worship; whom, what and when to kill; etc.; etc. The listing of programmes working on any human biological robot is quite long.

When it comes to a simple basic need such as eating, people will eat practically anything alive or not following a pattern, a programming. The programming they picked up at home.

Some foods are not safe to eat at all but people will still eat them because their eating programming tells them they have to.

This is a good example of what not to eat unless you want to get sick: Click HERE.

Here is another example of what not to eat: Click HERE.

Whatever your response to the above might be, it is part of a programming which in turn was part of another programming and so on and so forth. 

You are the result of a programming event of another random event where an inherited, balanced physico-chemical genetic system (DNA) was set off to work and carried to full development and the result of it was in turn also programmed as soon as it was brought into this world by your parents: You.

Once your parents handed you over to whichever society your parents belonged to, the experts of this social soup took over you and put the required programming in you to make you functional as an adult according to the overall needs of whoever controls you and is also in charge of all of the human cattle herd (Video 1).

                                Video 1. The Logical Song (Supertramp).

So, when was the last time you tested and tuned up your own robotic biological programming?

We all need an overhaul!!! More now than ever if we want to survive as a species!!!!!

We are working on ours. Are you working on yours? References Steinfeld K., Gerber P., Wassenaar T., Castel V., Rosales M. & de Haan C. (2006). Livestock´s long shadow. Environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy. 390 p.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: HUMANS ARE GULLIBLE

By Gundhramns Hammer
October 5, 2013

People can be easily lead to believe anything, especially if they are not content and full of doubts.

Source: Empty Kingdom




ENGLISH/ESPAÑOL

                        

THE WORLD CENTRAL BANK: THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS (BIS)

Source: Bilderberg.org
View original

The Money-Traders Global Network. Source: Bilderberg.org.

The BIS [Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland] is the most obscure arm of the Bretton-Woods International Financial architecture but its role is central. John Maynard Keynes wanted it closed down as it was used to launder money for the Nazis in World War II. Run by an inner elite representing the world's major central banks it controls most of the transferable money in the world. It uses that money to draw national governments into debt for the IMF [International Monetary Fund]. (Bilderberg.org)

 

The BIS [a bank that is not a bank] was originally established in May 1930 by bankers and diplomats of Europe and the United States to collect and disburse Germany's World War I reparation payments (hence its name). It was truly an extraordinary arrangement. Although the BIS was organized as a commercial bank with publicly held shares, its immunity from government interference - and taxes in both peace and war was guaranteed by an international treaty signed in The Hague in 1930. Although all its depositors are central banks, the BIS has made a profit on every transaction. And because it has been highly profitable, it has required no subsidy or aid from any government.  (Bilderberg.org)

 

BIS - Board and Senior Officials - July 2001 

READ MORE... 

 

Disclaimer:

The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein. The information herein contained is for educational and/or entertainment purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. These terms and conditions of use are subject to change at any time and without notice.

MICROWAVE SUBLIMINAL HYPNOSIS: HARASSMENT TECHNOLOGIES

Source: emhdf

There are five older technologies capable of extreme destruction of the ability to earn a living, and the quality of life of a target, listed below. None of these technologies require implants, and all can be transmitted silently, through walls, and leave no trace evidence. Since few targets will acquire the correct detection equipment, destruction of a target's life even using these older technologies is a perfect crime under today's justice system. Today's justice system denies that any effective through wall harassment technologies exist, probably because they tacitly approve of the activities of the "anti crime" vigilante groups who sometimes use this equipment.
Here is the list:

• A simple microwave oven, door removed, with the door interlock switch bypassed, and held against the bedroom wall of a target in an apartment building or semi-detached house. This device can cause a variety of disabling medical symptoms. Article
  
  
  MODIFIED microwave oven weapon for improved focus of the microwave radiation, from the article above
  
• Joseph Sharp's voice to skull success, performed with Dr. James C. Lin's pulsed microwave transmitter, and publicly announced in 1974 at the University of Utah: March 1975 "American Psychologist" journal 
• AUDIBLE sound transmitted directly into a target's skull, through a target's wall, of course, can drive the through-the-wall target crazy, and if the target complains, the target will be immediately diagnosed as mentally ill. The perfect crime. 
• Lowery's silent sound, patent 5,159,703 and used for self-help subliminal hypnosis tapes and CDs and by the U.S. Army in Gulf War One (1991). Together with Sharp's voice to skull, Silent Sound projected through a bedroom wall can hypnotize a target in their bed with the target being unaware. Unaware hypnosis is CLEARLY electronic harassment in the EXTREME!
  Silent Sound in Gulf War One
  
  
  Concept diagram, combined voice to skull and Silent Sound
  
• An old medical device, the Russian LIDA machine, a pulsed 40 watt, 40 MHz radio transmitter which can be used to make a target exhausted on the job when pulsing at the rate consistent with sleep, and with a pulse rate increase, DEPRIVE a target of sleep too! Notes on the LIDA machine
  
  
  Dr. Ross Adey is not a known participant in the human rights atrocities described on this site.
  
• Through clothing (and through non-conductive wall) RADAR, widely used at airports and by police to look through clothing for hidden weapons. The harassment potential of this technology in the hands of vigilante stalking gangs is obvious.
  
  Through wall/clothing radar image

The CLASSIFIED equipment, coming into wider use in the 1980s, can penetrate all shielding and is virtually unstoppable. Our group as yet does not have solid information as to how these classified devices work.  

SHEEP IN HUMAN CLOTHING – SCIENTISTS REVEAL OUR FLOCK MENTALITY

Have you ever arrived somewhere and wondered how you got there? Scientists at the University of Leeds believe they may have found the answer.

Their research suggests that humans flock like sheep and birds, subconsciously following a minority of individuals. The study at the University of Leeds shows that it takes a minority of just five per cent to influence a crowd's direction - and that the other 95 per cent follow without realising it.

The findings could have major implications for directing the flow of large crowds, in particular in disaster scenarios, where verbal communication may be difficult. "There are many situations where this information could be used to good effect," says Professor Jens Krause of the University's Faculty of Biological Sciences. "At one extreme, it could be used to inform emergency planning strategies and at the other, it could be useful in organising pedestrian flow in busy areas."

Professor Krause, with PhD student John Dyer, conducted a series of experiments where groups of people were asked to walk randomly around a large hall. Within the group, a select few received more detailed information about where to walk. Participants were not allowed to communicate with one another but had to stay within arms length of another person.

The findings show that in all cases, the 'informed individuals' were followed by others in the crowd, forming a self-organising, snake-like structure. "We've all been in situations where we get swept along by the crowd," says Professor Krause. "But what's interesting about this research is that our participants ended up making a consensus decision despite the fact that they weren't allowed to talk or gesture to one another. In most cases the participants didn't realise they were being led by others."

Other experiments in the study used groups of different sizes, with different ratios of 'informed individuals'. The research findings show that as the number of people in a crowd increases, the number of informed individuals decreases. In large crowds of 200 or more, five per cent of the group is enough to influence the direction in which it travels. The research also looked at different scenarios for the location of the 'informed individuals' to determine whether where they were located had a bearing on the time it took for the crowd to follow.

"We initially started looking at consensus decision making in humans because we were interested in animal migration, particularly birds, where it can be difficult to identify the leaders of a flock," says Professor Krause. "But it just goes to show that there are strong parallels between animal grouping behaviour and human crowds."

This research was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and was a collaborative study involving the Universities of Oxford and Wales Bangor. The paper relating to this research, entitled Consensus decision making in human crowds is published in the current issue of Animal Behaviour Journal.

Further information:

Clare Elsley, campuspr Ltd. Tel 0113 258 9880, Mob 07767 685168,
Email clare@campuspr.co.uk
Guy Dixon, Press Office, University of Leeds. Tel 0113 3438229,
Email g.dixon@leeds.ac.uk

Notes to editors:

1. Jens Krause is Professor of Behavioural Ecology, in the Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology. His research interests focus on the mechanisms and functions of group-living in animals.

2. The Faculty of Biological Sciences at the University of Leeds is one of the largest in the UK, with over150 academic staff and over 400 postdoctoral fellows and postgraduate students. The Faculty has been awarded research grants totalling some £60M and funders include charities, research councils, the European Union and industry. Each of the major units in the Faculty has the highest Grade 5 rated research according to the last government (HEFCE) Research Assessment Exercise, denoting research of international standing. The Faculty is also consistently within the top three for funding from the government's research councils, the BBSRC and NERC. http://www.fbs.leeds.ac.uk/

3. The University of Leeds is one of the largest higher education institutions in the UK with more than 30,000 students from 130 countries. With a total annual income of £422m, Leeds is one of the top ten research universities in the UK, and a member of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities. It was recently placed 80th in the Times Higher Educational Supplement's world universities league table and the University's vision is to secure a place among the world's top 50 by 2015.

4. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) is the UK's main agency for funding research in engineering and the physical sciences. EPSRC invests more than £500 million a year in research and postgraduate training to help the nation handle the next generation of technological change. The areas covered range from information technology to structural engineering, and from mathematics to materials science. This research forms the basis for future economic development in the UK and improvements in everyone's health, lifestyle and culture. For more information visit www.epsrc.ac.uk/

Fuente: Society News, University of Leeds, 14th February08